SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Thorlite Kenya Limited (Cause E338 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2229 (KLR) (27 September 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 2229 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2229
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2229 (KLR)
Decided
27 September 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureApplication for orders and declarationsCoramSC RUTTO
The court orders the Respondent to deduct and remit union dues to the Applicant and restrains the Respondent from victimizing employees for joining the union.

Facts

Kenya Engineering Workers Union (Applicant) recruited 17 employees of Thorlite Kenya Limited (Respondent) into its union membership. The Applicant demanded deduction of union dues and a Recognition Agreement, but the Respondent declined and started victimizing employees.

Issues

  • Victimization of employees for joining the union
  • Deduction and remittance of union dues
  • Recognition Agreement

Reasoning

The court found victimization of employees for union membership to be a violation of constitutional rights and ordered the deduction of dues and restraint from victimization.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • The respondent to deduct and remit union dues to the applicant
  • Restraint from victimizing employees for union activities

Remedies

  • Deduction and remittance of union dues
  • Restraint from victimization

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case