SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kashero v Five Forty Aviation Limited (Cause 2097 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2368 (KLR) (5 October 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2368 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2368
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2368 (KLR)
Decided
5 October 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair DismissalPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramDR. JACOB GAKERI
The Court held that the termination of the Claimant's employment was substantively unfair.

Facts

The Claimant, Brian Nsau Kashero, was dismissed by the Respondent, Five Forty Aviation Limited, on 14th August, 2017. The Claimant alleged unfair dismissal due to an alleged bribe given to a pilot, while the Respondent claimed the dismissal was due to the Claimant's alcohol intoxication.

Issues

  • Whether termination of the Claimant’s employment was unfair.
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent failed to prove the reasons for termination and that the grounds were not justifiable.

Outcome

The Court declared the termination of employment as unfair.

Orders

  • The Court declared the termination of employment as unfair.
  • The Court ordered the reinstatement of the Claimant without loss of benefits or in the alternative, payment of benefits amounting to Kshs.4,079,499/=

Remedies

  • Reinstatement without loss of benefits.
  • Payment of benefits amounting to Kshs.4,079,499/=

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (4)
  • Nicholus Kipkemoi Korir V Hatari Security Guards Ltd (2018) eKLR
  • Pius Machafu Isindu V Lavington Security Guards Ltd (2017) eKLR
  • Walter Ogal Anuro V Teachers Service Commission (2013) eKLR
  • Naima Khamis V Oxford University Press (EA) Ltd (2017) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case