SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Biiy v Panyako & 2 others; Laptrust & another (Interested Parties) (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 12 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2494 (KLR) (13 October 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 2494 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2494
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2494 (KLR)
Decided
13 October 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureClaimant's Motion for Leave to Amend and for Other OrdersCoramAN MWAURE
The court holds that the claimant's proposed amendments cannot be made as the issue was fully litigated in Kericho ELRC Cause No 13 of 2020 and the claimant was awarded arrears of his allowance at Kshs 2,040,000/-.

Facts

The claimant filed a claim for responsibility and airtime allowances from January 2017, which were stopped by the respondents in June 2017. The claimant alleged that he was unlawfully terminated on April 14, 2021.

Issues

  • Whether the claimant's proposed amendments in the amended memorandum of claim are res judicata

Reasoning

The court ruled that the claimant's proposed amendments are res judicata as the issue was already addressed in Kericho ELRC Cause No 13 of 2020, where the court awarded the claimant arrears of his allowance up to July 3, 2019.

Outcome

The court denied the claimant's motion for leave to amend and for other orders.

Orders

  • The claimant's proposed amendments to the memorandum of claim were denied.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Uhuru Highway Development Ltd v Central Bank of Kenya
  • Joseph Tama Ndua & 10 others v Jacaranda Hotels (MSA) Ltd t/a Jacaranda Indian Ocean Beach Resort
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case