SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kyusya v Scarce Commodities Ltd (Cause 392 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2567 (KLR) (19 October 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2567 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2567
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2567 (KLR)
Decided
19 October 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramAK NZEI, Ndolo
The termination was found to be unfair due to lack of substantive justification and procedural fairness.

Facts

Richard Mutua Kyusya was employed by Scarce Commodities Ltd as a driver. He was terminated on allegations of theft on 30/8/2016. He sought declarations, compensation, and other reliefs.

Issues

  • whether termination was unfair
  • Claimant's entitlement to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court found that the dismissal letter did not provide a valid reason for termination and that the employer did not follow the mandatory procedure required by the Employment Act.

Outcome

The court found in favor of the Claimant, declaring the termination unfair and awarding compensation.

Orders

  • Declaration of unfair termination
  • Payment in lieu of notice
  • Overtime pay
  • Severance pay
  • General damages
  • Costs of the claim

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case