SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Osoro v General Industries Ltd (Cause 1135 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 267 (KLR) (2 February 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 267 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
267
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 267 (KLR)
Decided
2 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair and Unlawful Termination of EmploymentPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramAN MWAURE
Holding

The termination of the Claimant's employment was unlawful, unfair, and contrary to the principles of natural justice.

Facts

The Claimant, Jared Osoro, was employed by General Industries Ltd. His employment was initially for a three-month period, which was later extended to six months. The contract was renewed periodically. The Claimant was summarily dismissed on July 2, 2017, without any reason, contrary to the terms of the contract and the Employment Act.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent presented a valid reason for terminating the Claimant's employment.
  2. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the termination was unlawful as it was not based on a valid reason and the Claimant was not given notice or an opportunity to explain himself. The court also noted that the termination was contrary to the terms of the employment contract and the principles of natural justice.

Outcome

The Claimant's termination was declared unlawful, unfair, and contrary to the principles of natural justice.

Orders

  • Judgment delivered virtually due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Remedies

  • Declaration that the termination of the Claimant's employment by the Respondent was unlawful, unprocedural, and discriminatory.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act 2007
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenfreight E. A. Limited vs Benson K. Nguti (2016) eKLR Civil Appeal No 31 of 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case