SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Katumbe v Sapna Bhandary t/a Chowpaty Fast Foods (Cause 1439 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2712 (KLR) (5 October 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2712 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2712
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2712 (KLR)
Decided
5 October 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureRespondent Responded to Claimant's SuitCoramOCHARO
The court found that the Claimant was summarily dismissed without notice, and thus the termination was unfair.

Facts

Claimant Esther Karimi Katumbe was an employee of Respondent Sapna Bhandary t/a Chowpaty Fast Foods, earning Kshs. 20,000 monthly. She was terminated without notice on unjustified grounds of alleged misappropriation of funds.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondent unfairly terminated the Claimant’s employment
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court considered the Employment Act 2007 and found that the termination was without notice, thus violating the Act.

Outcome

The court found in favor of the Claimant on the issue of unfair termination.

Orders

  • Declaration that the Claimant’s dismissal was unjust, inequitable and unfair
  • Payment of terminal benefits including outstanding leave, salary in lieu of notice, and gratuity
  • Service pay and issuance of Certificate of Service
  • Interest on terminal benefits and costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Declaration of unfair dismissal
  • Terminal benefits
  • Service pay
  • Interest on terminal benefits and costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case