SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Building Construction Employees Union v Vaghjiyan Enterprises Ltd (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 286 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2805 (KLR) (2 November 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 2805 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2805
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2805 (KLR)
Decided
2 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramMA ONYANGO
Holding

The Claimant has locus to represent the Grievants as the Respondent operates in the building and construction industry and the Grievants are members of the Claimant's union.

Facts

The Kenya Building Construction Employees Union filed a claim on behalf of two employees, Kellen Wambui Maina and Mary Jepkorir Tanui, who were employed by Vaghjiyan Enterprises Ltd. The employees alleged that their initial salary was Kshs 15,000 and it was increased to Kshs 23,000. They also claimed that the Respondent issued employment contracts dated March 1, 2022, which they refused to sign due to being unlawful and discriminatory.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant has locus to represent the Grievants
  2. Whether the Respondent had valid reason to issue termination notices to the Grievants
  3. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the orders sought in the Memorandum of Claim

Reasoning

The court held that the employees' right to join a trade union is protected under the Constitution and the Labour Relations Act. The Respondent's argument that the employees' roles are different was rejected, as membership is based on the sector in which the employer operates.

Outcome

The court dismissed the Respondent's prayer to dismiss the suit.

Orders

  • The Claimant has locus to represent the Grievants

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Relations Act
  • Building and Construction Wages Order of 2012
Cases cited (1)
  • Communication Workers Union v. safaricom Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case