SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njeri v Khalif Modern Homes Ltd (Employment and Labour Relations Appeal E138 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2890 (KLR) (10 November 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2890 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2890
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2890 (KLR)
Decided
10 November 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Chief Magistrate's CourtCoramSC RUTTO
The Court found that the Respondent did not prove the reasons for the Appellant's termination and that the termination was not fair.

Facts

The Appellant, Magdalene Gitari Njeri, was employed by the Respondent, Khalif Modern Homes Ltd, as a property advisor. Her contract was to subsist from 1st February 2021 to 8th February 2022. She was terminated on 8th September 2021 without a hearing and without being informed of the reasons for her termination.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondent had a justifiable reason to terminate the Appellant's employment
  • Whether the dismissal of the Appellant was in line with the requirements of a fair process
  • Whether the remedies sought by the Appellant lie in law

Reasoning

The Court emphasized that the Employment Act requires employers to provide justifiable reasons for terminating an employee's contract and to prove that the reasons are valid, fair, and related to the employee's conduct, capacity, or compatibility.

Outcome

The Appellant's appeal was successful, and the Court ordered the Respondent to pay Kshs 110,000 in compensation.

Orders

  • Payment of Kshs 110,000 to the Appellant

Remedies

  • Payment of Kshs 110,000 to the Appellant

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Pius Machafu Isindu v Lavington Security Guards Limited (2017) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case