SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbuvi v Real Management Services (2002) Limited (Cause 724 of 2018) [2023] KEELRC 2897 (KLR) (14 November 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2897 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2897
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2897 (KLR)
Decided
14 November 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair and Wrongful DismissalPostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramNZIOKI WA MAKAU
The Court finds the dismissal to be unfair and wrongful, and orders the Respondent to pay the Claimant Kshs. 26,100/- in unpaid house allowance, costs of the suit, and interest on the unpaid house allowance at court rates.

Facts

The Claimant, Fredrick Mutua Mbuvi, was employed as a caretaker by the Respondent, Real Management Services (2002) Limited, from March 2012. He was dismissed on January 5, 2018, for alleged tardiness. The Claimant claimed unfair and wrongful dismissal and refused to pay terminal dues.

Issues

  • Unfair and wrongful dismissal
  • Refusal to pay terminal dues
  • House allowance
  • Ex gratia payment
  • Unlawful termination compensation

Reasoning

The Court held that the dismissal was unfair and wrongful due to the lack of a lawful reason and the failure to follow the required procedure. The Claimant was entitled to house allowance and interest on the unpaid amount.

Outcome

In favor of the Claimant

Orders

  • Kshs. 26,100/- in unpaid house allowance
  • Costs of the suit
  • Interest on the unpaid house allowance at court rates

Remedies

  • House allowance
  • Costs
  • Interest

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Nicolas Wachira Koiga v NCR Kenya Limited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case