SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Katana v Tarmal Wire Products Limited (Appeal 20 of 2020) [2023] KEELRC 3458 (KLR) (19 December 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 3458 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3458
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 3458 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureRespondent's Notice of Preliminary ObjectionsCoramM. MBARŨ
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs, as the Practice Directions issued by the Chief Justice do not negate the law but apply to consolidate and standardize practice and procedures for the courts.

Facts

The appeal relates to a judgment from Mombasa CMEL Case No.1677 of 2014, where the respondent was found liable for work-related injuries. The appellant filed an appeal with the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court to hear the appeal
  2. Legitimacy of the appellant's expectation to be heard before the court

Reasoning

The court dismissed the preliminary objections, stating that the Practice Directions issued by the Chief Justice do not negate the law but apply to consolidate and standardize practice and procedures for the courts to enhance access to justice.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Objections dated 16 November 2023 are without merit and are hereby dismissed. Costs shall abide the outcome of the appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act, 2007
  • Judicature Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
Cases cited (5)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd [1969] EA
  • Sammy Ndungu Waity v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2019] eKLR
  • West Kenya Sugar Co. Ltd v Libuyi (Appeal E013 of 2021)
  • Perfect Scan Limited v Harrison Kahindi Said [2021] eKLR
  • Petition No.4 of 2019
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case