SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ali v Brinks Security Services Limited (Cause 420 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 481 (KLR) (23 February 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 481 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
481
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 481 (KLR)
Decided
23 February 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaim and Counter-ClaimCoramAK NZEI
The Court finds that the Claimant's employment was terminated by the Respondent on 31st December 2016, and the termination was unfair.

Facts

The Claimant, Said Omar Ali, was employed by Brinks Security Services Limited as a security guard from August 2013. He was dismissed on December 31, 2016, and claimed unfair termination. The Respondent denied the claim and counter-claimed for one month's salary in lieu of notice and lost/unrefunded items.

Issues

  • whether the Claimant's employment was terminated by the Respondent on 31st December 2016
  • whether termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair
  • whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought by him
  • whether the Respondent is entitled to the reliefs sought in the counter-claim

Reasoning

The Respondent did not demonstrate compliance with the mandatory procedure for termination of employment as per Section 41 of the Employment Act. The Claimant established, on a balance of probability, that his employment was terminated on 31st December 2016.

Outcome

The Court finds in favor of the Claimant and orders the Respondent to pay the claimed amounts.

Orders

  • The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant one month's salary in lieu of notice (ksh. 10,000), December 2016 salary (ksh. 10,000), service pay for 3 years (ksh. 15,000), and compensation for unfair termination (ksh. 120,000).

Remedies

  • The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the total amount of ksh. 185,000

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Stanley Omwoyo Onchweri -vs- Bom Nakuru Ymca Secondary School (2015) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case