SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

H. Young Company (EA) Ltd v Mwangi (Miscellaneous Case . E055 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 497 (KLR) (23 February 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 497 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
497
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 497 (KLR)
Decided
23 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous CasePostureApplication for extension of time to file a memorandum of appealCoramAN MWAURE
Holding

The court grants the application for extension of time, subject to certain conditions.

Facts

The respondent was dismissed on suspicion and awarded two months' salary equivalent compensation. The applicant failed to file an appeal within the statutory period due to delays in changing advocates and resolving the matter out of court.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant was entitled to an extension of time to file a memorandum of appeal
  2. Whether the respondent was prejudiced by the delay

Reasoning

The court found the applicant indolent and not serious in pursuing the appeal, but allowed it due to the respondent's potential financial hardship.

Outcome

The application is granted with conditions.

Orders

  • Payment of Kshs 30,000/- as costs to the respondent
  • Deposit of decretal sum in a joint interest earning account
  • Filing of appeal within 30 days subject to the conditions

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file a memorandum of appeal
  • Payment of costs to the respondent
  • Deposit of decretal sum in a joint account

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir vs Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others (2014) eKLR
  • Faustin Njeru Njoka vs Kimunye Tea Factory Limited (2022) eKLR
  • Njuguna Magichu & 73 others (2003) eKLR
  • Paul Wanjohi Mathenge vs Duncan Gichane Mathenge (2013) eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Salat vs The Independent Boundaries Commission & 7 Others Application No 16 of 2014
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case