SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kavila v Beta Healthcare International Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1632 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 498 (KLR) (28 February 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 498 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
498
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 498 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureRespondent appealed the decisionCoramJames Rika
Termination was fair, except on EDT, which does not warrant compensation for unfair termination.

Facts

Claimant was employed by Respondent from July 21, 2014 to May 12, 2017. He was suspended indefinitely without reason on September 21, 2016 and later terminated. He requested documents to respond to the letter to show cause, but was not provided with all requested documents.

Issues

  • Fair termination of employment
  • Compensation for salary and leave
  • House allowance in arrears
  • Interest on compensation

Reasoning

The Court found that termination was fair, except on EDT, and awarded salary for the period December 6, 2016 to May 10, 2017, terminal benefits, and interest.

Outcome

Claimant partially successful

Orders

  • Salary for 25 days in December 2016 at Kshs 132,500
  • Salary for January to April 2017 at Kshs 551,200
  • Salary for 10 days in May 2017 at Kshs 53,000
  • Terminal benefits tabulated to December 5, 2016 at Kshs 366,256
  • No order on costs
  • Interest allowed at court rate, from the date of Judgment till payment in full
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case