SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mutungi & 6 others v VIL Limited; Kaumbuthu t/a Mwenda Kaumbutu & Co Adovates & 4 others (Contemnor) (Cause 225 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 569 (KLR) (2 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 569 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
569
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 569 (KLR)
Decided
2 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureMotion for ContemptCoramCN BAARI, KLR Lenaola
Holding

The court found the affidavit in support of the motion not to be defective. However, the court determined that the Respondents are not in contempt of court as the orders were not directed at them and the matter is a matter of professional misconduct.

Facts

The Claimants/Applicants sought orders against the Contemnors/Respondents for failing to comply with court orders, including depositing sufficient securities, lifting the veil of incorporation, and declaring contempt. The Contemnors/Respondents were alleged to have concealed, disposed of, and sold attached goods.

Issues

  1. Whether the affidavit in support of the motion is incurably defective.
  2. Whether the Respondents are in contempt of court.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the affidavit was not defective, but the Respondents are not in contempt of court as the orders were not directed at them and the matter is a matter of professional misconduct.

Outcome

The motion for contempt was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Kenya Tea Growers Association Vs Francis Atwoli and 5 Others [2012] eKLR
  • Clarke and Others Vs Chadburn & Others [1985] 1All E.R (PC)
  • Cecil Miller v Jackson Njeru & Another (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case