SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Lake Basin Development Authority; Chere (Exparte Applicant) (Judicial Review E015 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 675 (KLR) (16 March 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 675 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
675
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 675 (KLR)
Decided
16 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx-parte application for judicial reviewCoramCN BAARI
Holding

The ex parte applicant’s motion is not defective by the mere reason that it is not accompanied by a statement of facts or supporting affidavit, and the ex parte applicant merits grant of judicial review orders.

Facts

The applicant, Frederick Onyango Chere, was summarily dismissed from his position as Chief Manager-Human Resources by the Lake Basin Development Authority on September 9, 2022. He seeks judicial review of this decision.

Issues

  1. Legality of the decision to dismiss the applicant
  2. Procedural impropriety in the disciplinary process
  3. Authority of the Ministry to dismiss employees

Reasoning

The court held that the decision to dismiss the applicant was not tainted with illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety, and that the applicant is not an employee of the Ministry but of the respondent's board.

Outcome

The ex parte applicant’s motion is not defective and the court grants the application for judicial review.

Orders

  • Order of judicial review by way of certiorari
  • Order of judicial review by way of mandamus
  • Order of judicial review by way of prohibition

Remedies

  • Reinstatement to previous position
  • Release of ex parte applicant's salary

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Interpretations and General Provisions Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Republic v Land Disputes Tribunal Court Central Division and another ex-parte Nzioka
  • Republic v National Land Commission and another; Ex parte Farmers Choice Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case