SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ng’ang’a v Githunguri Dairy Farmers Co-operative Society Limited (Cause 1250 of 2015) [2023] KEELRC 703 (KLR) (24 March 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 703 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
703
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 703 (KLR)
Decided
24 March 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a dismissal of a claim for non-attendance at a hearingCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The application is not merited, and the plaintiff is entitled to change his advocates and bear his own costs.

Facts

The plaintiff, Albert Kimani Ng’ang’a, was dismissed from his employment with Githunguri Dairy Farmers Co-operative Society Limited. He claims that he was not informed of the hearing date and that his advocates failed to attend, leading to his dismissal. He seeks to change his advocates and reinstate his claim.

Issues

  • Whether the dismissal of the plaintiff's suit for non-attendance should be set aside
  • Whether the plaintiff's failure to attend the hearing was due to his advocates' negligence or his own inaction

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff failed to explain the inordinate delay in filing the application and his separation from his initial advocates. The court also found that the plaintiff did not provide full disclosure and diligence in explaining his non-attendance.

Outcome

The application is dismissed and the plaintiff is granted leave to change his advocates.

Orders

  • Leave granted for the plaintiff to change his advocates

Remedies

  • Each party to bear their own costs of the application
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case