SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kinyanjui v One Software (EA) Ltd (Cause 2288 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 934 (KLR) (20 April 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 934 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
934
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 934 (KLR)
Decided
20 April 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramAN MWAURE
The court finds the termination was lawful but procedurally unfair due to the lack of a disciplinary hearing and the failure to follow the mandatory disciplinary process provided in the Employment Act.

Facts

The claimant, James Mwendu Kinyanjui, was employed by One Software (EA) Ltd as a software developer. He was terminated on 3rd April 2017, but later informed that his termination had been rescinded. He claims the termination was wrongful and seeks damages.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was lawful and fair
  • Procedural fairness in the termination process

Reasoning

The court found that the employer had a valid reason to terminate the claimant's employment due to poor performance and attitude, but failed to follow the mandatory disciplinary procedure as outlined in the Employment Act.

Outcome

The court declared the termination unlawful and unfair.

Orders

  • The termination is declared unlawful and unfair

Remedies

  • Damages for Kshs 1,016,666/-

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenfreight EA Limited v Benson K Nguti
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case