SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Odipo v Absa Bank Kenya (Cause E938 of 2021) [2025] KEELRC 3003 (KLR) (29 October 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELRC 3003 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3003
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3003 (KLR)
Decided
29 October 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's appeal against terminationCoramHS WASILWA
The court found that the termination was not justified and that the claimant was not subjected to due process. The claimant is entitled to the remedies sought.

Facts

Claimant Patrick Odipo was terminated by Absa Bank Kenya on April 17, 2021, for alleged fraudulent transactions involving a customer account. The claimant denied the allegations and provided evidence of his involvement in the customer's account setup.

Issues

  • Whether there were valid reasons for the claimant's termination
  • Whether the claimant was subjected to due process before termination
  • Whether the claimant's counterclaim is valid
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies sought

Reasoning

The court determined that the reasons provided for the termination were not valid and that the claimant was not given a fair chance to respond to the allegations. The court also found that the claimant's counterclaim was not proved.

Outcome

Claimant's appeal upheld, termination found to be unjustified

Orders

  • Termination of claimant's employment found to be unjustified
  • Claimant awarded severance pay, bonus, salary in lieu of notice, loss of earnings, damages, and medical cover

Remedies

  • Severance pay
  • Bonus
  • Salary in lieu of notice
  • Loss of earnings
  • Damages
  • Medical cover

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Banking Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case