SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wangai v Egerton University (Cause 224 of 2017) [2025] KEELRC 3702 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELRC 3702 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
3702
Citation
[2025] KEELRC 3702 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeExecution of DecreePostureRespondent's Application to Declare Full Satisfaction and Stay ExecutionCoramJAMES RIKA
Holding

PAYE tax was validly deducted from the sum payable to the Claimant by the Respondent in terms of the consent order. The Respondent shall pay interest on the principal amount for a period of 9 months at 14% p.a. and costs to the Claimant.

Facts

Claimant Peter Wangai sued Egerton University for unpaid salaries and interest. The parties executed a consent decree in September 2021, agreeing to pay the sum of Kshs. 16,772,916.35 over 33 months. The Respondent withheld PAYE tax and failed to pay compound salaries.

Issues

  1. Validity of PAYE tax deduction
  2. Full satisfaction of the consent decree
  3. Interest on unpaid amounts

Reasoning

The Court found that the consent order required the Respondent to pay the sum within 33 months, and the Respondent unilaterally extended the payment period. The Court declared that PAYE tax was validly deducted and ordered interest and costs.

Outcome

The Respondent's application was partly granted, with the Court declaring the validity of the PAYE tax deduction and ordering interest and costs.

Orders

  • PAYE tax deducted from the sum payable to the Claimant
  • Interest on the principal amount for a period of 9 months at 14% p.a.
  • Costs to be taxed in favour of the Claimant

Remedies

  • Interest on the principal amount for a period of 9 months at 14% p.a.
  • Costs to be taxed in favour of the Claimant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Income Tax Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Andrew Mukite Saisi v. Tracker Group of Companies
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case