SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Defence Council, Ministry of Defence & 2 others; Irai (Ex parte Applicant) (Judicial Review Application E009 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 103 (KLR) (26 January 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 103 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
103
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 103 (KLR)
Decided
26 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial Review ApplicationPostureApplication for Certiorari and MandamusCoramM. Mbarũ
Holding

The ex parte applicant's request for certiorari and mandamus is granted. The respondents are ordered to process and pay the ex parte applicant's pension dues.

Facts

The ex parte applicant requested discharge from service on August 8, 2007, and was approved. However, he absented himself without official leave for 1271 days. He was later found guilty of desertion and dismissed in March 2011. The KDF denied his pension claims.

Issues

  1. Certiorari to quash the decision denying pension payments
  2. Mandamus to compel respondents to pay pension dues

Reasoning

The court found the respondents' records inconsistent and denied the ex parte applicant's pension claims due to desertion. However, the ex parte applicant was properly discharged and had his pension claims approved prior to his desertion.

Outcome

The ex parte applicant's request for certiorari and mandamus is granted.

Orders

  • Recall and quash the decision of the 2nd respondent denying pension payments
  • Compel and direct the respondents to process, tabulate, and pay the ex parte applicant's pension dues

Remedies

  • Pension payments

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules
  • Law Reform Act
  • Kenya Defence Forces Act
  • KDF Pensions and Gratuities Regulations
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case