SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

AMW v LCVT Health (Tribunal Case 16 of 2020) [2021] KEHAT 674 (KLR) (17 December 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KEHAT 674 (KLR) KEHAT
Read PDF
Court
KEHAT
Case number
674
Citation
[2021] KEHAT 674 (KLR)
Decided
17 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureRespondent's appeal from a decision of the HIV and AIDS Tribunal
Holding

The Tribunal found that the Respondent’s employees unlawfully disclosed the Claimant’s HIV status to third parties without her consent, violating Sections 22 and 23 of the HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act.

Facts

The Claimant, a peer educator, was publicly shamed by three Respondent's employees who called her a 'defaulter' for not taking her antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). The employees disclosed her HIV status to her friends, fellow peer educators, and staff members.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent’s employees unlawfully disclosed the Claimant’s HIV status to third parties without her consent
  2. Whether the Respondent is vicariously liable for violation of the Claimant’s rights by its employees
  3. Whether as a result of the unlawful disclosure the Claimant suffered stigmatization and/or discrimination
  4. Whether the Claimant is entitled to damages

Reasoning

The Tribunal held that the employees’ public outbursts about the Claimant’s status violated the Act, and that the Claimant suffered stigmatization and discrimination.

Outcome

The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay damages to the Claimant for the unlawful disclosure of her HIV status.

Orders

  • Payment of Special Damages amounting to Kenya Shillings Fifty Seven Thousand Five Hundred

Remedies

  • Payment of Special Damages

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act Cap 246
Cases cited (2)
  • EOD –vs- OC & Another, HAT No. 17 of 2018
  • MCM – VS- BOO [2019] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case