SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

CMO v Kenya Airways Limited, Kenya Airways Medical Centre-Pride Clinic & Phanice Nafula Maonga [2021] KEHAT 84 (KLR)

[2021] KEHAT 84 (KLR) KEHAT
Read PDF
Court
KEHAT
Case number
84
Citation
[2021] KEHAT 84 (KLR)
Decided
5 November 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureRespondents filed Statements of Response, Claimant filed Statement of Claim
Holding

The Tribunal found that the Claimant's HIV status was unlawfully disclosed and confidentiality breached, but the Claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to support her claim of unlawful disclosure.

Facts

Claimant was an employee of Kenya Airways Limited who visited Kenya Airways Medical Centre-Pride Clinic for antenatal care. She disclosed her HIV status to the clinic's General Practitioner, Dr. Phanice Nafula Maonga. The clinic conducted various tests, including HIV tests, and shared her patient history with the Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentists Council.

Issues

  1. Whether there was unlawful disclosure and breach of confidentiality of the Claimant’s status
  2. Whether the Claimant was discriminated upon based on her status
  3. Whether the Claimant gave informed consent for the HIV related tests
  4. Whether the Claimant is entitled to damages

Reasoning

The Tribunal held that the Claimant's HIV status was disclosed without her consent, but the Respondents argued that the Claimant could have called a witness to corroborate her claim. The Tribunal also noted that the Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentists Council is authorized to disclose information under certain conditions.

Outcome

The Tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claim for unlawful disclosure and breach of confidentiality.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • HIV & AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006
  • Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act, Cap 253
  • Medical Practitioners and Dentists Board (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • W. A. –vs- Guru Nanak R. S. Hospital & 3 Others [2017]eKLR
  • S.M. –vs- E.N.A [2018] eKLR
  • J.L.N & 2 Others vs Director of Children Services & 4 Others (PETITION NO. 78 OF 2014)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case