SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

CMW v FWJL [2002] KEHC 1133 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 1133 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1133
Citation
[2002] KEHC 1133 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2002
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDivorcePostureRespondent filed preliminary objection to Petitioner's application for alimony and securing of matrimonial apartmentCoramJ.W. ONYANGO OTIENO, Ugandan
Holding

The application is struck out with costs to the Respondent

Facts

Petitioner seeks alimony pending suit in the sum of KSh.60,000/- per month and orders for the Respondent to secure and make available the matrimonial apartment at Simba Paradise on Plot Number 372 Diani Beach for the exclusive occupation of the Petitioner and her children.

Issues

  1. Whether the application is brought under Rule 3(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Rules
  2. Whether the application should have been by Notice of Motion and not by Chamber Summons
  3. Whether the application is incompetent and does not lie
  4. Whether the application offends clear provisions of Statute and Rules
  5. Whether the application is based on Sections 25 and 26 of the Matrimonial Causes Act
  6. Whether the application for alimony pedente lite falls under the exceptions under Rule 3(2) (a)
  7. Whether the age of the children referred to in the application as children are no longer children under the act

Reasoning

The application is based on Sections 25 and 26 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, and alimony pending suit can be granted before decree nisi is issued. The omission to issue notice requiring Affidavit of means to be filed or omission to validly issue a notice under Form 5 of the Affidavit cannot be put right without the Applicant going back to the “drawing Board.”

Outcome

Application struck out with costs to the Respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Matrimonial Causes Act
  • Rules of the High Court of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Salome Namukasa vs. Yosefu Bukya (1966) EA 433
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case