SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

STANLEY KARIUKI NJAU & ANOTHER vs WANJIRU M. KARIUKI & 2 OTHERS [2002] KEHC 259 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 259 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
259
Citation
[2002] KEHC 259 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Land Disputes TribunalCoramMbito, J
Holding

The court allows the application as prayed, ordering the Land Registrar to revoke the 2nd applicant's title, subdivide the land, and transfer 2 acres to the 1st respondent.

Facts

The land in dispute, L.R NO.GITHUNGURI/KIMATHI/248, was previously registered in the name of the 1st Applicant, Stanley Kariuki Njau, but is now in the name of the 2nd applicant, Wanjiru Kariuki. The respondents claim for a portion of the land, alleging it was transferred to the 2nd applicant in 1994, making them landless.

Issues

  1. Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claim for a portion of the registered land.
  2. Whether the respondents' claim was for working on a family land under customary law or for a portion of the land to be registered in their names.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the Land Disputes Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain the respondents' claim for a portion of the registered land, as the claim was for a portion of the land to be registered in their names, which is beyond the tribunal's jurisdiction.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • The Land Registrar to revoke the 2nd applicant's title, subdivide the land, and transfer 2 acres to the 1st respondent.
  • The court Executive Officer to sign the necessary documents.

Remedies

  • Revocation of the 2nd applicant's title.
  • Subdivision of the land.
  • Transfer of 2 acres to the 1st respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act
  • Magistrate's Court Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case