SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ALBERT NANDWA AYOMA & another v REPUBLIC [2002] KEHC 385 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 385 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
385
Citation
[2002] KEHC 385 (KLR)
Decided
26 March 2002
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.7040 of 1998 of the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kibera.CoramV.V. PATEL, W.K. TUYOIT
Holding

The conviction for Robbery is substituted for the death sentence, and both appellants are sentenced to 4 1⁄2 years imprisonment with effect from 12th June, 2000 plus two strokes for 1st appellant.

Facts

Albert and Rose Ayomo, husband and wife, admitted to robbing a complainant of cash and Indian Rupees. They tied up the complainant, threatened her with a knife, and took the cash from her house.

Issues

  1. Whether the conviction for Robbery should be substituted for the death sentence

Reasoning

The court found the case proper for substitution due to minor injuries and recovered cash. Both had clean records and no remission for robbery.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • Substitute the conviction for Robbery contrary to section 296(1), P.C.
  • Set aside the death sentences

Remedies

  • 4 1⁄2 years imprisonment with effect from 12th June, 2000 plus two strokes for 1st appellant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case