SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

LEISURE CAR HIRE & TOURS SAFARIS LTD. vs IMPERIAL BANK LTD. [2002] KEHC 529 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 529 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
529
Citation
[2002] KEHC 529 (KLR)
Decided
28 January 2002
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication for review of order declining to accept documentary evidenceCoramD.K.S AGANYANYA
Holding

The application fails and is hereby dismissed with costs to be paid by counsel personally.

Facts

The plaintiff filed an application for review of the order made in the case to reject vital documentary evidence from the plaintiff. The application was based on the grounds that the court rejected production of the signed written sale agreement as court ex in error or oversight, and that the sale agreement forms the main case of the plaintiff's claim.

Issues

  1. Whether there was a formal or informal order or decree from which an appeal is allowed or from which no appeal has been preferred or decree or order from which no appeal is hereby allowed to give rise to the application for review.
  2. Whether the provisions of Order XLIV of the Civil Procedure Rules apply to the present case.

Reasoning

The court found that there was no formal or informal order or decree from which an appeal is allowed or from which no appeal has been preferred or decree or order from which no appeal is hereby allowed to give rise to the application for review. The provisions of Order XLIV of the Civil Procedure Rules do not apply to the present case.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs to be paid by counsel personally.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Evidence Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case