SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

VINODKUMAR RAMDATTMAL vs MEHBOOD ALI KHAN [2002] KEHC 921 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 921 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
921
Citation
[2002] KEHC 921 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureEx parte hearing, judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffCoramT. MBALUTO
Holding

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff with costs and interest

Facts

The plaintiff, Vinodkumar Ramdattmal, owned a business called Anvi Metal Works that had a contract with the Department of Defence. Mehbood Ali Khan, who was previously an employee of the plaintiff, fraudulently registered a similar business name and obtained Shs.1,271,000 from the Department of Defence.

Issues

  1. Permanent injunction against the defendant for trading as Anvi Metal Works
  2. Recovery of Shs.1,271,000 from the defendant

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff had established his claim against the defendant on a balance of probability, despite the defendant's absence at the hearing.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff

Remedies

  • Permanent injunction against the defendant for trading as Anvi Metal Works
  • Recovery of Shs.1,271,000 from the defendant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case