SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mary Ndunge Wambua v Fedelis Wambua Musembi [2005] KEHC 1227 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 1227 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1227
Citation
[2005] KEHC 1227 (KLR)
Decided
8 September 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureRespondent filed preliminary objections to applicant's application to transfer Nakuru Children's Case No. 22 of 2005 to Nairobi Children's Court.CoramD. MUSINGA
Holding

The applicant is not in contempt of court orders and the application is not before the correct court. The applicant's application is struck out but with no order as to costs.

Facts

Applicant filed an application to transfer Nakuru Children's Case No. 22 of 2005 to Nairobi Children's Court for consolidation with Nairobi Children's Case No. 183 of 2005. Respondent filed a notice of preliminary objection, alleging the applicant was in contempt of court and the application was incompetent.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is in contempt of court orders
  2. Whether the applicant's application for transfer is before the correct court
  3. Whether the applicant's application is bad in law, duplex, incompetent, unsustainable and a total abuse of the court process

Reasoning

The applicant was not served with the orders she is alleged to have disobeyed and there was no evidence of contempt. The order of stay in Nairobi Children's Court Case No. 183 of 2005 is still in force and cannot be vacated or varied.

Outcome

Application struck out

Orders

  • Order of stay in Nairobi Children's Court Case No. 183 of 2005 remains in force

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • OMEGA ENTERPRISES (K) LTD VS KENYA TOURIST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & OTHERS Civil Appeal No. 59 of 1993 (unreported)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case