SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NATION MEDIA GROUP v COMMUNICATION CONCEPT [2006] KEHC 2571 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2571 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2571
Citation
[2006] KEHC 2571 (KLR)
Decided
10 May 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication to strike out the Defence
Holding

The 1st defendant's defence is a sham and is struck out. The 2nd defendant's defence raises a triable issue and is not struck out. The 1st defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs and the plaintiff is granted judgement in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st defendant.

Facts

The plaintiff, Nation Media Group, claims unpaid fees for advertisements carried in its newspapers, 'Daily Nation' and 'East African'. The defendants, Communication Concept, issued postdated cheques for Kshs.3,500,000, which were later dishonoured.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendants raised any triable issues.
  2. Whether the defendants' defence was a sham.

Reasoning

The plaintiff provided services and raised invoices, but the defendants failed to settle the invoices. The defendants' failure to produce evidence of payments left their assertions as no more than idle statements. The 2nd defendant's defence, however, is arguable and substantive.

Outcome

Judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st defendant.

Orders

  • The 1st defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs.
  • The 1st defendant's defence is struck out.
  • The 2nd defendant's defence is not struck out.

Remedies

  • Judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st defendant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • MURRI –VS- MURRI & ANOTHER [1999] 1 EA 212
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case