SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ALICE MUHONJA v KENNETH LITSWA ASEGA [2009] KEHC 359 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 359 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
359
Citation
[2009] KEHC 359 (KLR)
Decided
29 October 2009
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPostureAppeal from original trialCoramFRED A. OCHIENG
Holding

An interlocutory injunction is granted to restrain the respondent from demolishing the house in which the applicant lives on the suit property.

Facts

Alice Muhonja filed an application for revocation of a grant issued to Samuel Madaga Sabali, and for an interlocutory injunction to restrain Kenneth Litswa Asega from evicting her and from entering onto, using or cultivating the suit property. The respondent, Litswa Asega, was harassing the applicant by demolishing her house.

Issues

  1. Ownership of the suit property
  2. Revocation of the grant
  3. Interlocutory injunction

Reasoning

The applicant has demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success regarding the ownership of the suit property. The respondent is an innocent purchaser for value, but the applicant has raised serious issues regarding the conduct of the person who sold the property to the respondent.

Outcome

Alice Muhonja wins the application for revocation of the grant and for an interlocutory injunction.

Orders

  • An interlocutory injunction is granted to restrain the respondent from demolishing the house in which the applicant lives on the suit property.
  • The application for revocation is heard and determined as a matter of priority.

Remedies

  • Interlocutory injunction to restrain the respondent from demolishing the house in which the applicant lives on the suit property.
  • Interlocutory injunction to restrain the respondent from entering onto, using or cultivating the suit property.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case