SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC v BAHATI LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL & another Exparte GEORGE MWANGI GITHENDU [2011] KEHC 1252 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 1252 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1252
Citation
[2011] KEHC 1252 (KLR)
Decided
1 July 2011
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for orders of certiorari and prohibitionCoramM. J. ANYARA EMUKULE
Holding

The ex parte applicant's Notice of Motion is allowed, and the ex parte applicant is granted orders of certiorari to quash the decision of the Nakuru Land Disputes Tribunal and an order of prohibition against the Respondent.

Facts

The ex parte applicant, George Mwangi Githendu, sought orders of certiorari to quash the decision of the Nakuru Land Disputes Tribunal confirming ownership of the parcel of land known as Bahati/Kabatini Block 1/4220 to Peter Miruru Nganga. The Tribunal had also directed the court to compel the Chairman of KIUGU FIELD SCHOOL to issue a title deed to Nganga's plot in Phase II.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Nakuru Land Disputes Tribunal
  2. Ownership of the land

Reasoning

The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to make such orders and exercise powers it did not have or are not vested in it. The mandate of Land Tribunals is restricted to decisions on determination of boundaries, claims to occupy land, and trespass to land.

Outcome

The ex parte applicant's Notice of Motion is allowed.

Orders

  • Orders of certiorari to quash the decision of the Nakuru Land Disputes Tribunal
  • Order of prohibition against the Respondent

Remedies

  • Quashing of the decision of the Nakuru Land Disputes Tribunal
  • Prohibition against the Respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act, 1990 (No. 18 of 1990)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case