SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

WORLD DUTY FREE COMPANY LIMITED V KENYA AIRPORTS AUTHORITY [2012] KEHC 3251 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 3251 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3251
Citation
[2012] KEHC 3251 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureDefendant filed a Preliminary Objection on NoticeCoramAct. Indeed Hon. Njagi, Airport Terminal. Hon. Nambuye, E.R. Tindal C., Lord Goddard C., Nambuye, Njagi, Waweru
Holding

The court dismisses the Defendant's Preliminary Objection and allows the Plaintiff's main Notice of Motion to be heard on merit.

Facts

The Plaintiff brought a suit for various declarations and injunctive orders, claiming damages and breach of lease. The Defendant objected to the suit, arguing that Section 33 of the Kenya Airports Authority Act prescribed the remedy of arbitration.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit falls under Section 33 of the Kenya Airports Authority Act
  2. Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the case under Section 33 of the Act
  3. Whether the Plaintiff has served the Defendant with a Notice of Intention to Sue

Reasoning

The court interprets Section 33 of the Act strictly and restrictively, finding that it does not limit the citizen's rights to approach the court for other disputes than for compensation. The court also notes that Section 7 of the Arbitration Act does not apply, but the court can still grant an injunction and refer the matter to an arbitrator.

Outcome

The court dismisses the Defendant's Preliminary Objection and allows the Plaintiff's main Notice of Motion to be heard on merit.

Orders

  • The court dismisses the Defendant's Preliminary Objection

Remedies

  • The court allows the Plaintiff's main Notice of Motion to be heard on merit

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya Airports Authority Act, Cap 395 Laws of Kenya
  • Arbitration Act, 1995
Cases cited (5)
  • HCCC No. 684 of 2006
  • HCCC No. 1238 of 1999
  • HCCC 694 of 2003
  • HCCC No. 4 of 1999
  • Mukisa Biscuits
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case