SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC V JOHN IHUGO NJOGU & 2 OTHERS EX PARTE GRACE WAGIO WAWERU [2013] KEHC 4869 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4869 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4869
Citation
[2013] KEHC 4869 (KLR)
Decided
26 February 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureRespondent seeks to dismiss ex parte applicant's motion on noticeCoramG V ODUNGA
Holding

The court finds no merits in the Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2012 and dismisses it with costs to the 1st respondent.

Facts

The applicant sought a declaration that the Limuru Land Disputes Tribunal had no jurisdiction over the matter of trespass and the applicant's application for trespass and eviction was within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Limuru Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction over the applicant's application for trespass and eviction.
  2. Whether the applicant's application for trespass and eviction was within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

Reasoning

The court held that the issue of trespass was within the jurisdiction of the Land Disputes Tribunal and that the proceedings before the tribunal related to both title to land and beneficial interest in the suit land, which is not within the provisions of section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act.

Outcome

The Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2012 is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 30th July 2012 is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Muhia vs. Mutura (1999) 1 EA 209
  • Jotham Amunavi vs. The Chairman Sabatia Division Land Disputes Tribunal & Another (Civil Appeal No. 256 of 2002)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case