SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Kajiado District Land Disputes Tribunals & another Ex-Parte Elijah Kapoya Mosiro [2013] KEHC 6973 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6973 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6973
Citation
[2013] KEHC 6973 (KLR)
Decided
21 March 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx-parte application for certiorari and quashing of respondents' awardCoramG V ODUNGA
Holding

The tribunal had jurisdiction to determine boundary disputes, and the award did not affect the land subject to the pending succession cause.

Facts

The applicant, Elijah Kapoya Mosiro, sought to challenge an award made by Kajiado District Land Disputes Tribunal regarding land parcel No. Ngong/Ngong/11077. The award was confirmed by the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Kajiado. The applicant alleged that the tribunal was dealing with matters subjudice in High Court Succession Cause No. 1067 of 1991.

Issues

  1. Whether the Land Disputes Tribunals Act gave the tribunal jurisdiction to hear the dispute
  2. Whether the award affected the land subject to a pending succession cause

Reasoning

The court held that the dispute was substantially a boundary and trespass dispute, within the jurisdiction of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act. The award did not affect the land subject to the pending succession cause.

Outcome

The application for certiorari and quashing of the award was dismissed.

Orders

  • The application for certiorari and quashing of the award was dismissed with costs to the respondents and the interested party.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act 1990
Cases cited (2)
  • Muhia vs. Mutura (1999) 1 EA 209
  • Jotham Amunavi vs. The Chairman Sabatia Division Land Disputes Tribunal & Another (Civil Appeal No. 256 of 2002)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case