SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Afrison Export Limited & another v Continental Credit Finance Limited (In Liquidation) & 2 others [2013] KEHC 7058 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 7058 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7058
Citation
[2013] KEHC 7058 (KLR)
Decided
12 February 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeReal Property DisputePostureAppeal from a lower court judgmentCoramA. MABEYA
Holding

The court orders the Plaintiffs to be compensated for the value of the suit property at Kshs.4,086,683,330/- and awards the costs of the suit to the Plaintiffs.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, Afrison Export & Import Limited and Huelands Limited, are the registered proprietors of LR No. 7879/24 land. The Government of Kenya took possession of the land for the General Service Unit (GSU) of the Police Service in 1988. The Plaintiffs have not been compensated for the loss of use of the land.

Issues

  1. Compensation for the value of the suit property
  2. Compensation for the rental loss or loss of use of the suit property

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiffs are the legal and registered owners of the suit property and that the Government has not compensated them for the loss of use of the property. The court considered the valuation reports and determined the mean value of the three reports to be Kshs.4,086,683,330/-.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs are awarded Kshs.4,086,683,330/- in compensation for the value of the suit property and the costs of the suit are awarded to the Plaintiffs.

Orders

  • Judgment for the Plaintiffs against the 3rd Defendant for Kshs.4,086,683,330/-

Remedies

  • Compensation for the value of the suit property and costs of the suit
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case