SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Director of Public Prosecution & another Ex Parte Reuben Ngila Kitonyi [2016] KEHC 3176 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3176 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3176
Citation
[2016] KEHC 3176 (KLR)
Decided
21 September 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureEx parte application for mandamusCoramMumbi, Mumbi
Holding

The court found that the applicant has not disclosed with clarity the legal instrument imposing a duty on the respondent to disclose the results of the investigation. The court also ruled that the disciplinary proceedings against the applicant are not relevant to the criminal matter and cannot be used against the categorical statement required in these proceedings.

Facts

The applicant, Reuben Ngila Kitonyi, was an accused person in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 2881/1996) which was terminated by withdrawal under section 87A of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant sought certified copies of the investigation results and restoration to his position at the Central Bank of Kenya.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent (Director of Public Prosecution) is legally bound to disclose the results of the investigation.
  2. Whether the applicant's case for mandamus is valid given the lack of specific legal remedy and the absence of fresh investigations.

Reasoning

The court applied the principles of mandamus, emphasizing that it compels the performance of a public duty imposed by statute when the duty is not performed. The court ruled that the applicant failed to prove the existence of fresh investigations and that the disciplinary proceedings are not relevant to the criminal matter.

Outcome

The court dismissed the application for mandamus.

Orders

  • The respondent is not legally bound to disclose the results of the investigation.
  • The disciplinary proceedings against the applicant are not relevant to the criminal matter and cannot be used against the categorical statement required in these proceedings.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Common Law
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya National Examinations Council vs. Republic Ex parte Geoffrey Gathenji Njoroge & Others Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996 (CAK) [1997] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case