SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Political Parties Tribunal & 3 others Ex Parte Saadia Ahmed Mumin [2017] KEHC 2104 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2104 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2104
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2104 (KLR)
Decided
21 November 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial Review ApplicationPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for Judicial ReviewCoramAburili, Majanja, Megarry, Mumbi, Nyamu, Nyarangi, Oguk, Waki
Holding

The application for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed with costs.

Facts

The 1st interested party, Saadia Ahmed Mumin, filed proceedings against Ken African National Union and Kaltuma Abdullahi. She claimed that the filing of these proceedings was an abuse of the court process, as the existence of those proceedings had not been brought to the attention of the court. She also sought to transfer the proceedings to the High Court, Garissa for consolidation with High Court Petition No. 452 of 2017.

Issues

  1. Whether the filing of the proceedings was an abuse of the court process.
  2. Whether the proceedings should be transferred to the High Court, Garissa for consolidation with High Court Petition No. 452 of 2017.

Reasoning

The court considered the requirements for leave to apply for judicial review and the purpose of the leave to filter out frivolous applications. The court found that the application was not an arguable case and thus denied leave.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for leave to apply for judicial review was dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Republic vs. Land Disputes Tribunal Court Central Division and Another Ex Parte Nzioka [2006] 1 EA 321
  • Republic vs. County Council of Kwale & Another Ex Parte Kondo & 57 Others Mombasa HCMCA No. 384 of 1996
  • Mirugi Kariuki vs. Attorney General Civil Appeal No. 70 of 1991 [1990-1994] EA 156; [1992] KLR 8
  • Re Bivac International SA (Bureau Veritas) [2005] 2 EA 43 (HCK)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case