SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Cyrus Kanyi v Consolata Hospital & another [2017] KEHC 2422 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2422 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2422
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2422 (KLR)
Decided
6 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at NairobiCoramJ. K. SERGON
Holding

The court awards the plaintiff pain and suffering damages of Ksh.3,000,000, special damages of Ksh.1,310,000, and future medical expenses of Ksh.500,000, totaling Ksh.4,810,000. The court also awards costs of the suit and interest on the damages at court rates.

Facts

The plaintiff, Cyrus Kanyi, was involved in a road traffic accident on 8th December 1999, resulting in multiple fractures. He was treated at Nyahururu District Hospital and later transferred to Consolata Hospital, where he was operated on by Dr. John Maganga. The plaintiff claims the operations were botched and caused complications.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff suffered any loss of income
  2. Whether the plaintiff incurred special damages
  3. Whether the plaintiff will require future medical expenses
  4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to pain and suffering damages
  5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs and interest

Reasoning

The court finds no credible evidence of loss of income and awards special damages based on the pleaded amount. Future medical expenses are awarded a global figure due to the difficulty in determining the exact amount.

Outcome

In favour of the plaintiff

Orders

  • Award of pain and suffering damages
  • Award of special damages
  • Award of future medical expenses
  • Award of costs of the suit
  • Award of interest on damages

Remedies

  • Pain and suffering damages
  • Special damages
  • Future medical expenses
  • Costs of the suit
  • Interest on damages
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case