SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wilson Kaberia Nkunja v Magistrates and Judges Vetting Board & Judicial Service Commission (Petition 154 of 2016) [2018] KEHC 9274 (KLR) (Civ) (22 June 2018) (Judgment)

[2018] KEHC 9274 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9274
Citation
[2018] KEHC 9274 (KLR)
Decided
22 June 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureOriginal trialCoramBeageant, I-LL, IL, Jessie Lesiit
Holding

The Court held that Section 23 (2) of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution does not oust the jurisdiction of this Court to review the Board's decisions affecting Magistrates.

Facts

Wilson Kaberia Nkunja petitioned against the Magistrates and Judges Vetting Board and Judicial Service Commission regarding the Board's decision to declare a Magistrate unsuitable to continue serving.

Issues

  1. Whether Section 23 (2) of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution ousts the jurisdiction of this Court to review the Board's decisions affecting Magistrates.
  2. Whether the question of this Court's jurisdiction to review decisions rendered by the Board was conclusively determined by the Supreme Court of Kenya.
  3. Whether this Court can examine the merits of the Petition.
  4. What are the appropriate orders for Costs?.

Reasoning

The Court interpreted the relevant provisions of the Constitution and the relevant statutory provisions, emphasizing the need to promote the spirit, purport, values, and principles of the Constitution, advance the rule of law, human rights, and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of Rights, and contribute to good governance.

Outcome

The Petition is dismissed.

Orders

  • The Petition is dismissed.
  • The appropriate orders for Costs are to be determined by the court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Vetting of Judges and Magistrates Act
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • Supreme Court of Kenya cases
  • Zimbabwe cases
  • South Africa cases
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case