SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Law Society of Kenya v Office of the Attorney General & 2 others (Constitutional Petition 203 of 2020) [2021] KEHC 454 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (10 June 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KEHC 454 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
454
Citation
[2021] KEHC 454 (KLR)
Decided
10 June 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureAppeal from the High Court at NairobiCoramJA Makaau, Ncgobo
Holding

The court held that the President had no power to transfer functions of constitutionally established institutions and that the Executive Order No. 1 of 2020 was unconstitutional.

Facts

The Law Society of Kenya filed a constitutional petition against the Office of the Attorney General and others, alleging that Executive Order No. 1 of 2020 and other legislation contravened the Constitution of Kenya 2010.

Issues

  1. Whether the President had powers to transfer and place various tribunals and constitutional commissions under ministries and state departments.
  2. Whether Executive Order No. 1 of 2020 was unconstitutional.
  3. Whether the misjoinder of parties in the constitutional petition was fatal.
  4. Whether a party could raise an issue not contained in the pleadings through submissions.

Reasoning

The court interpreted the Constitution to mean that it should be interpreted in a manner that promotes its purposes, values, and principles, advances the rule of law, and human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Outcome

The petition was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Judicial Service Commission Act
  • Law Society of Kenya (Act No. 21 of 2014)
Cases cited (3)
  • Coalition for Reform and Democracy (CORD) & another v the Republic of Kenya & another
  • Bernard James Ndeda & 6 others v Magistrates and Judges Vetting Board & 2 others
  • Michael Maina Kamami & another v Attorney General
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case