SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

County Builders Limited v Accounting Officer, Ministry of Transport, Infrastructure, Housing, Urban Development and Public Works, State Department of Housing and Urban Development & another (Application 144 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 16 (KLR) (15 December 2020) (Decision)

[2020] KEPPARB 16 (KLR) KEPPARB
Read PDF
Court
KEPPARB
Case number
16
Citation
[2020] KEPPARB 16 (KLR)
Decided
15 December 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeProcurement DisputePostureApplication for ReviewCoramMativo
Holding

The Board cancels and sets aside the Letters of Notification of Termination and the Re-advertisement of the tender, directs the Procuring Entity to conclude the procurement proceedings within 14 days, and each party bears their own costs in the Request for Review.

Facts

County Builders Limited filed an application against the Ministry of Transport, Infrastructure, Housing, Urban Development and Public Works regarding the tender for the Proposed Construction of Kangari Market in Muranga County. Two anonymous letters were submitted alleging corruption and unethical conduct during the tender evaluation process.

Issues

  1. Corruption and unethical conduct in the tender evaluation process
  2. Consequences of the tender evaluation process not being concluded

Reasoning

The Board found that the tender evaluation process was marred by corruption and unethical conduct, leading to the cancellation of the tender and the re-advertisement.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • Cancellation and set aside of Letters of Notification of Termination
  • Cancellation and set aside of Re-advertisement
  • Concluding the procurement proceedings within 14 days
  • Each party bears their own costs

Remedies

  • Cancellation of tender documents
  • Concluding procurement proceedings

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Public Procurement Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.4 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case