SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Longjian Road & Bridge Company Limited v Accounting Officer, Kenya National Highways Authority; China Railway Seventh Group Company Limited (Interested Party) (Application 44 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 19 (KLR) (14 April 2020) (Decision)

[2020] KEPPARB 19 (KLR) KEPPARB
Read PDF
Court
KEPPARB
Case number
19
Citation
[2020] KEPPARB 19 (KLR)
Decided
14 April 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePublic Procurement ReviewPostureApplication for ReviewCoramMs. Faith Waigwa, Arch. Steven Oundo, OGW, Mr. Alfred Keriolale, Ms. Rahab Chacha
Holding

The Board cancelled the award to China Railway Seventh Group Company Limited and directed the Procuring Entity to reinstate the Applicant's bid and conduct a re-evaluation.

Facts

Longjian Road & Bridge Company Limited requested a review against the decision of the Accounting Officer of Kenya National Highways Authority regarding the construction of Mau Mau Road Lot 1B: Kiambu County Section.

Issues

  1. Cancellation of the award to China Railway Seventh Group Company Limited
  2. Reinstatement and re-evaluation of the Applicant's bid

Reasoning

The Board found that the subject procurement process had not been for review and thus proceeded to cancel the award and direct the Procuring Entity to re-evaluate the Applicant's bid.

Outcome

The Board granted the orders to cancel the award and reinstate the Applicant's bid.

Orders

  • Cancellation of the award to China Railway Seventh Group Company Limited
  • Reinstatement and re-evaluation of the Applicant's bid
  • Conduct a re-evaluation of the Applicant's bid and other bidders at the Technical Evaluation Stage
  • Conclude the procurement process within 14 days

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the Applicant's bid
  • Conduct a re-evaluation of the Applicant's bid and other bidders

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.5 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case