SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kitheka v Mauti & another (Complaint 293 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 394 (KLR) (8 June 2017) (Judgment)

[2017] KEPPDT 394 (KLR) Public Procurement Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Public Procurement Tribunal
Case number
394
Citation
[2017] KEPPDT 394 (KLR)
Decided
8 June 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureAppeal from an earlier decisionCoramCatherine Manzi Kitheka, Dennis Nyamboga Mauti, Jubilee Party
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the letter in question did not constitute a withdrawal from the nomination exercise by the 1st Respondent and that the 1st Respondent is the party's duly elected nominee for the position of MCA, Majoge Basi Ward.

Facts

The 1st Respondent, Dennis Nyamboga Mauti, was the winner of the nomination exercise for the position of Member of County Assembly in Majoge Basi Ward, Bomachoge Chache Constituency, Kisii County. However, the 2nd Respondent, Jubilee Party, forwarded the 1st Respondent's name to IEBC despite the 1st Respondent's withdrawal from the race.

Issues

  1. whether the Claimant is the duly elected nominee for the position of Member of County Assembly Majoge Basi Ward, Bomachoge Chache Constituency, Kisii County
  2. what reliefs should be granted, if any.

Reasoning

The Tribunal considers the evidence and the submissions of all parties, concluding that the letter did not constitute a withdrawal and that the 1st Respondent was the winner of the nomination exercise.

Outcome

The complaint is dismissed with no orders.

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.4 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case