SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gabriel Odongo Owidi v Geoffrey Otieno Opiyo & Orange Democratic Movement [2017] KEPPDT 31 (KLR)

[2017] KEPPDT 31 (KLR) Public Procurement Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Public Procurement Tribunal
Case number
31
Citation
[2017] KEPPDT 31 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureAppeal from a decision of the Orange Democratic Movement's County Appeals Tribunal
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the nomination exercise was peaceful and conducted in a free and fair manner, and the 1st Respondent, Geoffrey Otieno Opiyo, was duly declared the winner.

Facts

The Claimant, Gabriel Odongo Owidi, contested the nomination of Geoffrey Otieno Opiyo as the 2nd Respondent's nominee for the position of Member of County Assembly, South Kasipul Ward, Kasipul Constituency, Homa Bay County. The nomination exercise was held on 24th April 2017, and the Claimant alleged irregularities.

Issues

  1. Whether the nomination exercise was marred with irregularities
  2. Whether the Claimant should be gazetted as the 2nd Respondent's nominee

Reasoning

The Tribunal did not consider the evidence and testimony of the Returning Officer, who declared the 1st Respondent as the winner, and the nomination exercise was peaceful and conducted in a free and fair manner.

Outcome

The application is dismissed with no orders.

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case