SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Owidi v Opiyo & another (Complaint 286 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 405 (KLR) (25 May 2017) (Judgment)

[2017] KEPPDT 405 (KLR) Public Procurement Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Public Procurement Tribunal
Case number
405
Citation
[2017] KEPPDT 405 (KLR)
Decided
25 May 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureAppeal DismissedCoramM. O. Lwanga, Desma Nungo, Paul Ngotho, Dr. Adelaide Mbithi
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the 1st Respondent was duly declared the winner of the nomination exercise and the Claimant has failed to convince the Tribunal that he is the party's nominee for the said position.

Facts

The Claimant, Gabriel Odongo Owidi, contested the nomination of Geoffrey Otieno Opiyo as the 2nd Respondent's nominee for the position of Member of County Assembly, South Kasipul Ward, Kasipul Constituency, Homa Bay County. The 1st Respondent, Geoffrey Otieno Opiyo, was declared the winner of the nomination exercise.

Issues

  1. Whether the nomination exercise was marred with irregularities
  2. Whether the Claimant should be gazetted as the 2nd Respondent's nominee

Reasoning

The IDRM proceedings did not benefit from the evidence of the Returning Officer, and the IDRM did not consider the evidence and testimony of the 1st Respondent. The Returning Officer declared the 1st Respondent as the winner, supported by polling results forms and tallying sheets.

Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

Orders

  • Application dated 18th May 2017 dismissed with no orders as to costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.4 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case