SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Marube v Jubilee Party & another (Complaint 146 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 78 (KLR) (25 May 2017) (Ruling)

[2017] KEPPDT 78 (KLR) Public Procurement Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Public Procurement Tribunal
Case number
78
Citation
[2017] KEPPDT 78 (KLR)
Decided
25 May 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureReview of RulingCoramKyalo Mbobu, James Atema, Hassan Abdi
Holding

The application for review is granted, and the applicant is declared the duly nominated candidate for South Mugirango Parliamentary Seat under the Jubilee ticket.

Facts

Zablon Rashid Minyonga was declared a Jubilee Party candidate for South Mugirango Parliamentary Seat on 28th April, 2017. However, the Tribunal declined to issue him with a nomination certificate due to lack of sufficient evidence.

Issues

  1. Whether a sufficient case has been made to warrant reviewing the Tribunal's Ruling

Reasoning

The Tribunal found new evidence in the form of a declaration form and affidavit from the Returning Officer, which declared the applicant as the winner. The Tribunal granted the review due to the new evidence and the lack of due diligence by the Respondents.

Outcome

The applicant is declared the duly nominated candidate, and the nomination certificate is issued to him.

Orders

  • Declaration of the applicant as the duly nominated candidate
  • Issue of the nomination certificate to the applicant
  • Recall and revocation of the nomination certificate for the 2nd respondent
  • Mandatory injunction against the 1st respondent to not issue a nomination certificate to the 2nd respondent

Remedies

  • Nomination certificate for the applicant
  • Recall and revocation of the nomination certificate for the 2nd respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Political Parties Act, 2011
  • Evidence Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.5 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case