SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Transmar Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 379 of 2019) [2021] KETAT 169 (KLR) (30 July 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KETAT 169 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
169
Citation
[2021] KETAT 169 (KLR)
Decided
30 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a default assessment
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the Appellant is responsible for providing the details used for registration and cannot blame the Respondent for not being able to access its iTax.

Facts

The Appellant, Transmar Limited, was assessed by the Respondent, Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, for VAT and income tax. The Appellant filed an objection and later appealed the assessment.

Issues

  1. Whether the Appellant was unable to file returns due to lack of access to email, iTax password, or postal services.
  2. Whether the Appellant's PIN was suspended by KRA.
  3. Whether the Appellant was notified of KRA assessments.
  4. Whether the Respondent considered purchases while computing VAT amount payable.

Reasoning

The Tribunal ruled that the Appellant's inability to access its iTax was its own responsibility and not the Respondent's fault. The Appellant's PIN suspension was not substantiated.

Outcome

Affirmed the assessment

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Tax Procedures Act, 2015
  • Value Added Tax Act, 2013
  • Income Tax Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 1.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case