Joseph Nyamai Munywoki v National Transport and Safety Authority [2021] KETLABT 190 (KLR)
- Court
- KETLABT
- Case number
- 190
- Citation
- [2021] KETLABT 190 (KLR)
- Decided
- 27 September 2021
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the National Transport and Safety AuthorityCoramDick Waweru, Prof. Kiarie Mwaura, Moses Parantai, Aden Noor Ali, Betty Chepng’etich Bii
Holding
The Appellant is entitled to the endorsement of class A & I in his license and should use this order as proof of that entitlement. NTSA should update the Appellant’s smart driving license with class A & I endorsement within seven (7) days of this order.
Facts
The Appellant is a holder of a class A & I license issued by the Respondent. He has been driving under the license for 28 years and applied for a smart driving license, but class A & I was omitted.
Issues
- Whether the Appellant's physical driving license is valid and should be updated in the smart driving license
- Whether the Appellant should be entitled to the endorsement of class A & I in his license
Reasoning
The Appellant proved to the satisfaction of TLAB that he had been driving for 28 years and that the physical license had a class A & I endorsement.
Outcome
Affirmed
Orders
- That the Appellant is entitled to the endorsement of class A & I in his license and should use this order as proof of that entitlement.
- That NTSA should update the Appellant’s smart driving license with class A & I endorsement within seven (7) days of this order.
- That the order be served upon NTSA and the Traffic Commandant.
Remedies
- The Appellant is entitled to the endorsement of class A & I in his license and should use this order as proof of that entitlement.
- NTSA should update the Appellant’s smart driving license with class A & I endorsement within seven (7) days of this order.
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- National Transport and Safety Authority Act No. 33 of 2012
- Traffic Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…