SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kangemi Matatu Owners Sacco Society Ltd v National Transport & Safety Authority & 2 others;Westland Watch for Peace, Gender & Development & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KETLABT 652 (KLR)

[2021] KETLABT 652 (KLR) KETLABT
Read PDF
Court
KETLABT
Case number
652
Citation
[2021] KETLABT 652 (KLR)
Decided
26 March 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTransport Licensing Appeals Board AppealPostureAppeal from the Transport Licensing Appeals Board (TLAB)CoramJustice Ojwang
Holding

The preliminary objection is merited and ought to be considered given that it meets the threshold set out in the law.

Facts

Kangemi Matatu Owners Sacco Society Ltd (KMO) is a savings and credit cooperative society licensed by the National Transport and Safety Authority (NTSA) to operate public service vehicles. NTSA issued a license to LATEMA Travellers Bus & Safaris Co Ltd, and KMO objected to the issuance of the license.

Issues

  1. Whether the preliminary objection met the threshold of the law by not dealing with disputed facts
  2. Whether section 38 (1) of the NTSA Act enables an objector (a third party) to make an appeal to TLAB

Reasoning

The court found that the preliminary objection was based on a legal point rather than disputed facts, as it questioned the jurisdiction of TLAB to hear KMO's appeal.

Outcome

The appeal was allowed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • National Transport and Safety Authority Act No. 33 of 2012
  • County Government Act of 2012
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (4)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd (1969) EA 696
  • Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission v 141 Jane Cheperenger & 2 Others [2015] eKLR
  • Orarov Mbaja [2015] eKLR
  • Oraro v Mbaja [2005] eKLR 141
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case