Kenyan case law
-
Managing Director, Kenya Pipeline Limited & another v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others (Civil Application Sup E018 of 2024) [2025] KECA 756 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents
-
Elias v Njoka; Njeru (Proposed Respondent) (Civil Appeal (Application) 10 of 2020) [2025] KECA 952 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The appeal has not abated against the other twenty (20) respondents, and the appellant is at liberty to pursue the appeal against them.
-
Kenya Urban Roads Authority & another v Belgo Holdings Limited (Civil Appeal E011 of 2021) [2025] KECA 764 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The trial court's determination in High Court Civil Case No. 266 of 2005 was found to be an in rem determination, and thus the dispute was caught up by issue estoppel.
-
Mputhia v Republic (Criminal Appeal 12 of 2018) [2025] KECA 945 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The conviction and sentence are upheld, but the death sentence is set aside and replaced with a 30-year imprisonment.
-
Kikopi & another v Mkalla (Civil Appeal E037 of 2022) [2025] KECA 751 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the respondent properly discharged his burden of proof of ownership of the suit portion to the required standard, and the appellants' evidence did not dislodge the respondent's evidence.
-
Monarch Insurance Company Limited v Issak & another (Civil Appeal E025 of 2024) [2025] KECA 840 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal is incompetent as no leave to appeal was sought.
-
Mberia v Mbui & 4 others (Civil Appeal 177 of 2020) [2025] KECA 1000 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
-
Mwaura v Republic (Criminal Appeal 52A of 2016) [2025] KECA 827 (KLR) (9 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal on conviction is dismissed. The appeal on sentence lacks merit and is dismissed.
-
Lelei v Bitok (Civil Appeal (Application) 040 of 2022) [2025] KECA 749 (KLR) (6 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is granted, and the notice of appeal and record of appeal are validated and the time for filing the record of appeal is extended.
-
Mishack v Cheruiyot & another (Civil Application E027 of 2022) [2025] KECA 747 (KLR) (6 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is allowed to the extent that leave is granted to join Elisha Kipyegon Ngeno as the 1st respondent's legal representative.
-
Lelei v Bittok (Civil Appeal (Application) 041 of 2022) [2025] KECA 746 (KLR) (6 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
-
Chepkiyeng v Kobkangoi (Civil Application E049 of 2024) [2025] KECA 748 (KLR) (6 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
-
Mishack v Cheruiyot & another (Civil Application E026 of 2022) [2025] KECA 745 (KLR) (6 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The Court allowed the application to the extent that it granted leave to join Elisha Kipyegon Ngeno as the 1st respondent's legal representative.
-
Rono (Sued as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Sofia Tamarta Lagat alias Tamarta Lagat - Deceased) & another v Lagat; Kipkoech (Sued as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Hellen Jeptum Rono - Deceased) (Interested Party) (Civil Application E009 of 2024) [2025] KECA 740 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The court orders the applicants to file and serve their notice of appeal and record of appeal within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
-
Kandie v Kapkoros alias Elizabeth Kimoi Jacob Kapkoros (Civil Application E037 of 2024) [2025] KECA 742 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The court allows the applicant's notice of motion application, granting extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and a record of appeal within 7 days from the date of this ruling.
-
Ng'etich & 5 others v Ng'etich & 3 others (Criminal Application E047 of 2024) [2025] KECA 744 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed for non-compliance with the court's directions.
-
Sang & 2 others v Kugun & 8 others (Civil Application E043 of 2024) [2025] KECA 739 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd Interested Parties.
-
Estate of Julius Mabusi Nandasaba alias Julius Wafula alias Julius Mabusi alias Jairus Wafula Represented by Benson Juma Mabusi and Mathews Simiyu Mabus v Satia & Partners & 9 others (Civil Application E032 of 2024) [2025] KECA 743 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The Court allows the application and grants the applicant extension of time to serve a notice of appeal within 7 days from the date of this ruling.
-
Mogere v Telkom Kenya Limited (Civil Appeal 531 of 2019) [2025] KECA 736 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The Court dismisses the appeal and orders costs to be awarded to the respondent.
-
Mutunga v Republic (Criminal Appeal E028 of 2022) [2025] KECA 729 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The conviction is quashed and the appellant is released
-
Mutuma v Republic (Criminal Appeal 101 of 2018) [2025] KECA 1010 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The conviction and sentence are upheld.
-
Mangiti & 21 others v Republic (Criminal Appeal E111, E162, E056, E055, E054 & E053 of 2023 & E006 of 2024 & E021 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2025] KECA 735 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeals are allowed, and the acquittals are reinstated.
-
Mwingirwa v Nkauraru & 2 others (Civil Application E119 of 2024) [2025] KECA 946 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs as the applicant has not shown that there is an arguable appeal and that the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory absent an order for a stay.
-
Kabura (As the Administrator of the Estate of Ishak AF) v Board of Trustees National Social Security Fund (Civil Appeal 451 of 2019) [2025] KECA 733 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal is dismissed
-
Mugambi (Suing in a Personal Capacity and also as an Administrator of the Estate of the Late Julius Muringi Mugambi - Deceased) & 3 others v Hosea & 4 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E182 of 2024) [2025] KECA 998 (KLR) (2 May 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the respondents as there are no arguable grounds of appeal.